The other evening I wrote a short twine game to try and decompress the emotional impact of spending any amount of time online. It's not particularly subtle.
You can play it right from your browser here.
Official Site of writer, anthropologist, musician, games designer, and all-around slacker, Jacob Germain.
Wednesday, July 31, 2013
Monday, July 15, 2013
How to do Things with Video Games review
A few weeks back I read and reviewed a book by Dylan Holmes called “A Mind Forever Voyaging,” which billed itself as a history of narrative storytelling in video games. The book has a particular political bent, which is legitimizing the study and cultural importance of video games as a whole. Ian Bogost here in his book “How to do Things with Video Games” has the same political bent, but the difference in tact is night and day. Where Holmes is cloying and earnest, Bogost is meticulous and lofty. Where Holmes relies on personal parables Bogost relies on the work of his own studio to make points.
It’s an unfair comparison, really. Holmes is a few years younger than I am and has barely established himself as a blogger in some extremely interesting but still relatively obscure websites. Bogost, on the other hand, is a forty something professor of media studies who also founded a reasonably successful games company and has written several books before this one. I remember reading his writing seven and eight years ago in fairly mainstream gaming blogs and I’ve played a number of his games. Bogost, in many respects, is where Holmes wants to be. In this political movement, however, it’s a comparison that’s gonna get made.
Bogost’s book is part of a series called “Electronic Mediations,” which is a typically self-serving series of academic liberal arts books designed to explore the appreciation and usage of the digital in a discursive cultural context, essentially the sort of legitimacy that Holmes is looking for.
But that’s academia, not the real world. In the real world we’re on the cusp of yet another console generation, $500 machines designed to take what a game is and make them yet bigger and yet better in a march of technological innovation. At the same time we’re watching a medium on the cusp of breaking free from its antiquated industry and reach a broader audience on more platforms than ever before. New models of payment have proven wildly successful and new forms of funding doubly so. Change is in the air, but it’s not quite clear what that change is as 2006’s console war starts anew with a fresh crop of corporate devotees eager to defend the honour of their favorite computer and its associated iconography and handful of exclusive titles.
Cynicism aside, Bogost’s book is actually very refreshing in its approach. The book is divided into chapters based on an answer to the question “what can video games be,” ultimately building an argument not for simple cultural consideration, but for creativity, making the final point that games will achieve the sort of social status they’ve recently been yearning for once they find themselves encompassing a breadth of human expression rather than simply as entertainment products or “timewasters.” He describes examples of each expression, from pranks to drills to relaxation, and advocates for new and more varied ways games can be used in those categories. One of the strongest arguments he makes is that the inevitable taming of gaming’s wilderness, the appreciation of gaming as a medium and not a particular entertainment vehicle, will inevitably lead to the destruction of the “gamer.” Once we reach the point that the average person has some modicum of gaming literacy under their belt and games are used in a variety of contexts for a variety of purposes, the notion of “gamer” will lose its relevance. All people will know how to game, so all people will be gamers.
This idea isn’t new. It’s actually along the lines of what Bogost and a few others have been writing for years. This idea is, however, novel. The games industry as it exists today is very much focused on one thing: making a ton of money for everyone involved. They do that of course by creating focus-tested entertainment products that have a massive overhead and ergo can’t risk innovation or creative expression beyond those expressions that are at least fairly likely to make money. The traditional concept of the industry is in a bad way. Over the last console generation development costs for an average run of the mill game ballooned from 5 million to twenty million plus, meaning that even a few flops can seriously damage the financial standing of a mid-size publisher. And damage it has with the last 5 years party to more layoffs and studio closings or mergers than any time since the video game crash of the 1980s. Part of it has to do with a decrease in consumer spending (and ultimately the long decline in consumer spending power brought about by stagnant wages) and another part has to do with the rise and proliferation of mobile gaming, introducing a platform that traditional publishers were slow to embrace or understand and largely unlimited by the old deals that industry leaders have bargained amongst each other to cut newer publishers out of the big three consoles.
Anyway I’m rambling and my point is this: publishers are shit fucks at taking risks and they have a lot of good reasons for it. Where else can we go? Why, the indie market, of course! Indie games have had a number of shots to the arm in the same timeframe that old-money has had a number of shots to the gut. Stuff like humble indie bundles, the runaway success of Minecraft, Kickstarter, the proliferation of digital storefronts like Steam and Green Man Gaming et al, and most importantly a general sense of disgust, of fed-up-ness with the traditional models. So the Indie world is thriving, with more and more kickstarters for alt-consoles with open platforms and hippy philosophies.
Problem is that many (though definitely not all) of the games that are coming out of this movement bear no small resemblance to the typified entertainment product model of gaming. Games are new and interesting twists on 2d platforming or music games or shooters or 3d brawlers or whathaveyou, but they’re (frequently) not trying to say anything new in gaming. It’s a morose situation, especially when compared to the versatility of other media. In writing, for example, a person can write an instruction manual or a love letter or a novel or a doctoral thesis or a letter to the editor or a news article or a review or a stream of consciousness expression of the internal mental states of anxiety or so on. Games are just as capable of that kind of breadth but historical industrial constructions and the social understanding of games are holding them back from this.
Or so Bogost’s argument goes.
Wednesday, July 10, 2013
Rebelde
I’ve been on the bus for just over two solid days now. I have slept for a total of perhaps 4 hours, owing largely to my personal inability to sleep upright. Much of today has been punctuated by accidental microsleeps, closing my eyes and following my mind down some irrational track.
I traveled out of New Orleans on a bus headed for Shreveport, wide eyed and bushy tailed. The bus was crowded, but quickly became less so as people left. In Shreveport, though, the connecting bus to Dallas was about 2 hours late as the earlier bus broke down and a new driver had to be found to make the trip. More delays in Dallas meant the trip through texas had much smaller breaks than indicated on the little itinerary slip. Consequently I was able to see much less of Texas than I wanted.
What I did see a lot of was poverty. Greyhound serves millions of travelers each year, but thanks to its low price, long travel time, and simple amenities, Greyhound also serves what is essentially the lowest classes of people, the homeless, the destitute, the working poor. The construction and execution of air travel has always been an upper/middle class endeavor, with servants and in-flight entertainment. Even the modern conceit of commuter air still holds the trappings of former affluence; food amenities drastically pared but still extant.
When airline travel is threatened, it becomes national headlines. When these symbols of decadence are twisted and used against still other symbols of decadence, it sparks war. Air travel is the bourgeoisie, air travel is a target. No one assaults a bus line, since there’d be nothing to prove. There’s no message in killing the oppressed when you yourself are oppressed. No one ever looked into my bag, despite large regulations thereof. No one checked my carryon. The driver is “protected” by a frame of plexiglass and a door and the same legal statues that protect your municipal busdriver.
Compare this to traveling across New Mexico, in the highway closest to the border. We were stopped en route at a specific border patrol checkpoint. Other cars and automobiles simply have an officer stand outside and glare into the car, hoping to determine citizenship with a piercing glow and gut instinct (and license tags). He then waves them on, those droids being not the ones he was looking for. For our bus, though, two armed men entered the bus and began down the row on either side asking each passenger one simple question: “Are You a U.S. Citizen,” only slowing to look at the one Canadian passenger’s details and to glare more thoroughly at the handful of Hispanic passengers. Then they left, our freedom obtained and secured, jobs protected, taxes mad sacrosanct. A large wooden sign advertising for people to join the border patrol and a handful of shiny less-than-three-year-old cars painted in the green and white of the force closed out the scene.
The most common rhetoric in anti-immigration literature and arguments is some kind of variant on “they’re going to take our jobs” which is a fear generally based on the fear of loss of resources. The sheer poverty of the border fuels this fear, since there is so little success to be had, giving up any must feel like a zero-sum game, where any loss on your part is at a clear gain to the other and vice versa. But even still, even as the dead empty scrubland of Texas cringes softly at the concept of an invading force (of people who originally owned and occupied the land, and who constitute the majority of its residents), the destitution persists and the unequal relationship between the maquiladoras of Chihuahua and their NAFTA enabled goods shipping across to El Paso and massive warehouses and onward to supply America with things to buy maintains a steady parasitism. No amount of border patrol agents are going to stop the influence of money and tantalizing hopes of a middle class American lifestyle.
One of the things I notice most about New Orleans as a whole is the utter lack of Hispanic people and the ensuing paucity of Spanish being spoken in public places. Churls and pedants will be quick to note that the city does have a Hispanic population, though largely relegated to suburbs or generally marginalized by their low proportion of the population. Louisiana in general is not much different, Dallas similarly so, but as our bus crossed Texas the concept of what was “American” and what was “Mexican” blurred and merged and created whorls and eddies of symbolism. Former Spanish Catholic missionaries became town halls and meeting sites, rancheros proudly advertised their allegiance to the U.S. of A. Midland, Texas has a sign celebrating the town as the hometown of President George W. Bush and Laura Bush; the town is comprised of at least half Hispanic people.
By the time we arrived in El Paso, the transformation was complete and I was the only white monolingual I saw for the entire hour I aimlessly wandered outside the station. The rhetoric at this point becomes useless. If there’s an invasion, they’ve won. If it’s a hostile buyout, they’ve made the best offer. They don’t just take American jobs, they’re making the jobs in that part of America. The city itself is very nice and clearly has had a good deal of effort put into transforming it into a major player, with tourist destinations and nice hotels and fairly clean streets, all of which serve as a jarring contrast to Juarez, just on the other side of a very persistent fence . Juarez is a scrabbled together city built out of adobe houses erected on top of and to the side of dirty, ungreened hills. Juarez is the city famous for pancho villa and famous for a perpetual and ongoing gang war that leads to weekly shoutouts on public streets. The police are either shockingly corrupt or obviously afraid and the entire town is built on a framework of hoping and praying that the next day isn’t the last.
It’s poor, and it’s the kind of poor that we as Americans like and need, since they’re poor enough to make our clothes for dirt cheap while we deport their families and maintain the system that keeps them in the maquiladoras. A day later we drive by the American Apparel factory with a big sign that declares it to be “la compania rebelde.”
Saturday, June 29, 2013
Parents
My
dad once told me that the reason he quit facebook after his very brief
time using it was because he wasn’t a narcissist and didn’t think anyone
should care to hear about whatever random thing pops into his head or
whatever. This is sort of fitting with his generally reticent and
private approach to life and is not something I really on any level
understand. I know some people do eventually end up becoming great
friends with their parents and I imagine some even learn to comprehend
their reasoning, but that’s never really been an option as far as I’m
concerned. My dad is a bit scary and unfathomable and I always feel
guilty and odd and generally uncomfortable around him. Not really a
Kafkaesque terror of him and his virility or superiority or anything
like that, just the sort of unease around someone who is or was or has
been something of a distant relative for most of your childhood while
you were raised by someone who was vituperatively in opposition to him,
popularly blaming him for behavioral mishaps or occasionally summarily
labeling you as “just like your father” when you don’t think you did
anything particularly wrong but anyway it creates a lot of odd tension
there.
It’s
not to say I don’t like my dad, in fact I like him very much. It’s not
to say I don’t emulate him either, it’s just a weird uncomfortablility.
Like a scar that didn’t really heal right so now you can’t quite flex
your middle finger without some awkwardness or you can’t fully curl your
toes or putting your knees on the ground just so causes you intense pain.
Personal
writing gets compared to masturbation a lot, with the same connotations
of the sort of thing you should do in the privacy of your bathroom or
not at all and sharing it is kind of privately looked down on. It’s a
sort of “keep it in the family/stop snitching” thing that serves as a
social force actively preventing expression. The idea that no one wants
to hear what you have to say or that you’re just repeating other people
but worse or the idea that you’re whoring yourself out for attention and
on and on. They’re all constructs of the mind; excuses and
rationalizations and justifications for the sublimation of your self or
your ego or your character or your internal monologues.
And
they’re understandable. Nothing in the world is more understandable
than insecurity. Literally every being who has ever lived on this planet
grapples with some form of insecurity. Insecurity is just the
difference between your mental idea of what you should be and who you
are and no one lives up to their internal idea of who they are. And we
can only blame ourselves, ultimately. Every single day we wake up and go
literally or metaphorically outside and expose ourselves to image after
image after icon after symbol of perfection and beauty and moral
rectitude and every single day we go outside and get ourselves into
vicious knife-fights with each other about how badly we’re failing to
live up to standards and we invent news standards by which to appease
ourselves about the other being that much worse so at least even if we’re failing to be perfect we’re more perfect than they are
and it goes on and on until we’re all aged and infirm and judging each
other in the gated communities right up until they find us dead in the
kitchen trying to eat a 100 calorie yogurt cup or sitting in front of The Real Life mouth open midway through complaints about the imperfections of kids these days.
It’s
a wonder anyone gets out of bed at all and not at all surprising when
many of us don’t or would like not to except for our need to feed
ourselves and cover our surroundings with distractions from our
imperfection.
So
I don’t know what to tell you. Insecurity is a force in your head and
it’s a force that paralyzes you with fear, more or less, and stops you
from achieving the full expression of your personhood. Yes it does bad
things but it’s not like it’s for me to tell you that you should stop it
or anything so trite as the idea that since it’s only in your head then
it’s somehow any less real or physical or deadly. Conceptually this is
just me describing the problem, attempting to find its true name so it
can be bound or banished like any other demon or spirit.
Personal
writing has benefits, chief among them being the sort of organizational
power they can have for your thoughts. Through personal writing you can
discuss a certain set of emotions you feel and read them back to
yourself on paper and think about them in a new way and come up with new
conclusions. With personal writing you can synthesize information that
flows through your brain on your daily slog through underachievement
world and turn it into something coherent and meaningful. With personal
writing you can escape the flesh and bone and keratin shell you’re
trapped in and at last interface with the world around you, if only in
an instantaneous, photographic way.
It’s
also a weak point. A vulnerability, a sort of handing keys to your car
to whoever happens by except those keys are to your feelings, or if
you’re at least a little more guarded it’s like exposing a tiny bit of
yourself underneath the armor you wear out of doors as you walk through
the hell-world that is social interaction, not enough to get seriously
wounded but enough to hurt and enough to bleed and enough to keep you
awake until you bind that wound or eventually forget about it or find
yourself attentively deleting every attack and rationalizing away every
attack and booting them all out of your restaurant because they hurt you
and your world. It’s admitting to the world that beneath your armor and
behind your façade and below your cool you are “only” human and “only”
human in a way that denies or disrupts or destroys your pretension
otherwise. You are “only” imperfect, despite all the attempts to say and
prove otherwise and everyone is there to steal your perfection from
you, cutting you down and making you that other because it’s the way to become more perfect.
I
understand, I know there are things about yourself don’t say. You don’t
say them because you don’t want to deal with their implications or
their complications or their consequences. I am bisexual and I don’t say
it to gay men because it turns into a conversation about inevitability
and I don’t say it to straight people because it becomes an
inevitability and I don’t say it to the progressive enlightened because
it becomes a conversation about the injustice rendered by what they
assume to be bisexuality, the transphobia that they insist it implies,
so it becomes another conversation about inevitability, that ultimately I
must not be bi but homo/hetero/pan. So I say nothing and let what
assumptions will pass wash over me. Better this than to listen to an
endless litany of nonsense and overt erasure. Dan Savage would be mad,
but then Dan Savage thinks I don’t exist anyway, since Dan Savage has
invaded my brain and determined for me who I am or am not attracted to.
But
that’s not really much of a thing. Depression is another one of those
things. You don’t tell friends or family members about your suicidal
ideation, really, because it’s not likely a ton of people are really
going to understand it and their attempts to do so are usually
inadequate at best and it’s not like they can actually do anything other
than suggest debilitating drug regimens and a cavalcade of well-meaning
but ultimately terrible professionals that act out a devised script
based on a handful of academic theories loosely derived from a crackpot
with way too much influence. People who do talk about depression are
inordinately brave, since there’s always always always someone in the
crowd who is gonna yell “why don’t you just get over it, loser?” or you
grow up with a parent who thinks you should just willpower your way out
of all the problems she described you as having and all the problems you
actually had and then later a pre-jilted lover tells you “wow it’s a
wonder you don’t hate all women” because all of literary criticism
theory and much of semiotics is based on that same crackpot and his
weird obsession with children’s relationships to their parents.
Friday, June 21, 2013
View
I climbed slowly up the cliffs, my hands grasping cold stone
in the moonglow, the road below me further and further away. The snow hadn’t
touched the cliff, fortunately, and after a few terrifying moments my hand
grasped the plateau and hoisted my body up and over. There before me lay the
temple I sought.
Surrounded with snow-covered ornamentation—a fountain and
some decorative steps—the temple was grand in its scale and yet simple in
design, hearkening to Greek design. I knew not what I would find inside, yet I
would not have been surprised to find a massive statue of Zeus or a smaller
statue of Lincoln.
As I walked through the ornamental steps and ascended the
pathway, I was struck with an overwhelming feeling of dĂ©jĂ vu. I’ve been here before, I thought to
myself. But it was different now, covered in snow and forgotten on a
cliff-side.
I stepped into the grand archway that marked the temple’s
threshold and found myself in a small room softly lit by a golden glow that
resonated well with the room’s gold leaf and red velvet walls. It felt an
infinitely warm and comforting contrast to outside’s dark indigo and
silvery-white moonlight reflected on the cold snow. The room and the room
beyond it were filled with dioramas housed in glass cases gilt with gold trim.
They each depicted a different sort of battle scene, playing out silently in
mechanical clockwork. Here tiny golden tanks fired glittering explosive shells
into a field. There small airplanes dropped golden bombs onto a small dingy
city. In the next room tiny soldiers fired tiny machine guns into each other,
mortar exploding around them and grenades being thrown, all perfectly quiet.
At the end of the second room was a door, simple and brown
compared to the splendor around me. As I saw the door I realized I had indeed
been here before, in another time, perhaps another life. I recalled beaming
with pride at the diorama here, having built it to demonstrate the genius and
inevitable success of the Third Reich. Before, these walls lay bare and rooms
empty. He was someone else, though. From somewhere else. Still, the door
remained.
I opened the door only to find a yet smaller room, just wide
enough to hold a couch and a computer desk and a small television with
nondescript images flickering across the screen. The room was brown with cheap
particle board paneling, the couch a nondescript grey-yellow-green color.
Inside the room was an older man, hair white but still standing tall and proud.
I barely paid attention to his outfit, which appeared to be a dark blue robe
with silver trim. He spoke to me and asked if I had found some evidence for
humanity’s continued survival, for its redemption. I thought for a moment and
as my attention wandered I found myself at the crest of a hillside overlooking
a quiet coastal town, night illuminated by the sharp moonlight, city glowing
softly with human lights.
The port, I could see, was at the end of a ship-filled
lagoon, beyond it a glittering ocean. The sight was beautiful, the small wooden
ships gently rocking to the waves, the town below me laying in silence. I found
myself walking to a nearby building, a restaurant, small and well-worn, a light
layer of grime attesting to its habitation. Inside, I knew, was a woman I also knew
and loved from the lowest depths of my heart. But she was not there, and in
that moment I was returned to the study. “Well Belphegor?” said the man to me.
“Have you found it?” As he spoke what I was not aware was my name, his
appearance changed, becoming something less human and more indefinably alien. I
saw myself change as well—into a reflection of him.
I sat on the couch, brainstorming what I would say, what
argument I would give. As I did the door of the study opened and in walked the
woman. My heart yanked as she smiled her beautiful warm smile at me, said a few
quiet words to the man and then left again. “Have I always known her?” I asked
myself. The man stared expectantly. I drifted over to the computer desperate to
build an argument that would satisfy his questioning. I mulled over reports of
human kindness, human hope, human courage, human love. I built my case
thoroughly and meticulously and began to present it soberly and intensely.
But as I spoke my mind began to drift and I thought of the cruelties
and the injustices and the greed and the malfeasance. I thought of war, of
perpetual endless war. I thought of hate, justified and rationalized and
reproduced again and again. I thought of fear and loss and grief and wounds and
scars and destruction. I began to weep, to cry openly. I choked with fear and
sadness, I stopped my argument and spoke instead: “I don’t know. I don’t know
if humanity deserves to continue. I don’t know if it’s redeemed. I don’t know.”
The man smiled a warm, knowing smile.
Wednesday, June 19, 2013
Porn Review Special Report: Breast Expansion
One
of the operating assumptions of this series and of erotic materials in
general is that the female body is sex. The form of a woman is designed
to entice, the function of a woman is to arouse and ultimately climax
the other party, male or female. Breast expansion as a paraphilia is an
expression of this idea in terms of breast paraphilia. Since boobs are
one of the most popularly sexualized body parts in modern western
society, it should come as little surprise that the modification
(specifically here the growth of breasts. Breast shrinkage or deflation
is a separate and much less common paraphilia) of those parts is one of
the most popular paraphilia.
Breast
expansion is exactly what it sounds like, the expansion of breasts on
women. This is sometimes presented in a “before and after” fashion,
sometimes depicted as it happens, and occasionally is applied as a label
to characters depicted with larger breasts than is canonically known.
For this special report I’ve selected two comics and a handful of
related gifs to discuss the impact and creation of this paraphilia, as
well as elements of the community formed around it.
Surprisingly,
I am not an expert in sexuality, so take what I say with whatever
grains of salt you wish. I’m more of an expert in the construction of
online cultures than a person who has performed significant research
into the areas of human sexuality. What I’m here to do, however, Is
present and critique a handful of viewpoints and use my experiences to
deconstruct the paraphilia as a whole.
Trigger Warning: Nonconsensual body modification, general reduction of women into objects
Monday, June 3, 2013
Transfuture Allstars - A Porn Review
In
this day and age, old notions of gender and sexuality are challenged
daily by individuals across the country. Every day I can get up and go
outside and walk a few blocks and bump into at least half a dozen
proponents of queer desire. I live with a drag queen, an embodiment of
an often unspoken acknowledgement that gender is a performance; if not
necessarily a refutation of that performance (opinions are divided).
It’s
a great time to live in and I and my blue fingernails and desire to be
objectified and pursued are quite happy about it as a whole. What does
this mean in the porn world, though? The queer has always been the
exotic, and thus erotic, and as such “tranny” and “shemale” porn has
been rampantly popular for at least the last two decades. Much of the
erotic desire in this particular branch of porn comes from the
unexpected and interesting juxtaposition of a penis being on a person
who behaves and is arrayed as female. Much in the same way that racial
porn works, the actual character or portrayal matters little. The
person’s sole erotic interest is in their unusual features.
However
this is only one branch of queered pornography, and one that appeals to
a certain set of western straight men primarily. What I’m about to
cover here takes an entirely different approach to the concept. Instead
of exoticizing queer desires, Radio’s artwork normalizes those desires
in a setting that emphasizes the consent and safety of all participants.
It’s transgressive in the best sort of way and should be interesting to
look at. I’m going to cover three of her short comix, which I believe
can all be found at Slipshine
for subscription money or elsewhere if you’re patient/determined.
Slipshine is a great outfit in the vein of topatoco, providing another
revenue source for the talented and interesting sort of people who
typically write or draw webcomics. It also has a notable bent towards a
progressive concept of sexuality, where it should be fun and appealing
to everyone rather than a narrow group of straight men. I have more to
say about the movement later.
Trigger Warning: Literally nothing. This stuff is cute as shit.
Captain’s log stardate June 3, 2013
I’m sitting on my bed
in an empty 15’ by 20’ rectangle that contains a whole buttload of stuff I
neither need nor particularly want. Also food and musical instruments and cloth
genital coverings. The power is out. I don’t know why it’s out this time, but I
assume it has to do with the complete disregard for financial stability the roommate
property manager drag/welfare queen drug dealer has. 24/7 he runs the A/c in
the front room. 80* in the winter, 68* in the summer. It’s obscene. I paid a
bill for him one, in that I motivated my self to the bill paying place with
money he gave me. $382 for a month’s electricity. I assume this is why the
power is out, but this is new Orleans still and basically power is optional.
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Thursday, May 23, 2013
My Racist Neighbor - A Porn review.
To be fully honest with you I’m not sure why I downloaded this. If I recall correctly I was herpin’ and derpin’ on the pirate bay and clicked over on their top 100 drawn pornography section and the title caught my eye for being silly and whatever. Imagine my surprise when I downloaded it and found out it was some godawful nonsense No, I wasn’t surprised. Shitty crap is the norm for this stuff.
Let’s get the trigger warning here out of the way, because I want to put up the cover for this.
Trigger warning: Racism, Incest, almost certainly nonconsensual sex, more racism. Really this whole thing is just bad racial porn with incest and rape thrown in to differentiate following issues from previous ones.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
